🔴 TEEN STALKER ADMITS TERRORISM CHARGE AFTER SCHOOL PROM THREAT

Police searches of Rahman’s phone and electronic devices revealed a sustained pattern of online extremism reinforcing the conduct already under investigation. Officers found material spanning neo-Nazi propaganda, incel ideology and violent Islamist content, alongside graphic videos depicting executions, beheadings and violence against women.

Ms Gates told the court that Rahman was not merely consuming extremist content. He was an administrator of a far-right Telegram group known as the Sturmjager Division, which promoted violent extremist ideology and glorified mass attackers.

On 30 January 2024, Rahman downloaded two instructional videos titled “How to make bomb in your mum’s kitchen” and a PVC pipe bomb tutorial. These contained techniques similar to those used in previous terrorist attacks. A notebook recovered from his belongings, titled “Dihan’s socialist diary” and decorated with a hammer-and-sickle emblem, listed everyday sources for chemicals used in bomb-making.

After Rahman was seen photographing one of the girls at school, a teacher examined his phone and discovered extremist imagery, misogynistic material, and messages referring to a “Valentine’s school shooting”. A noose was later found in his locker at the Army Cadet Force centre, after which he was banned from attending.

Despite his arrest and release on bail with strict conditions not to contact the victims, Rahman continued to target them online. He published so-called doxing documents containing personal information about the girls, their families and a teacher, portraying them as a “danger to men” and exposing them to further harassment.

In September 2024, a Stalking Protection Order was imposed prohibiting any contact with the victims or school staff. Further breaches led to Rahman’s arrest in November, when police seized a laptop containing additional extremist material and evidence of continued online activity. While on remand, he sent correspondence to cadet headquarters complaining of “women privilege” and stating: “Even a conviction won’t stop me.”

The facts of this case must be seen in the context of wider concerns highlighted by MPs and parliamentary committees about online radicalisation among young people. Reviews of the Prevent programme and parliamentary reports have noted that some individuals consume content across multiple extremist ideologies—including far-right, jihadist and misogynistic incel material—without coherent ideological commitment, and that such “mixed” radicalisation can contribute to real-world offending.

Now aged 19, Rahman changed his plea during the trial and admitted possessing terrorist documents and videos. Passing the case for sentence, Judge Simon Mayo KC said: “These are very serious offences and they will require appropriate punishment. I will take into account everything I read and am told about you before deciding the nature and length of that sentence.”

Chief Superintendent Helen Flanagan, head of operations for Counter-Terrorism Policing London, said: “This case is yet another example of a growing and concerning trend of young people being drawn into extremist, violent and terrorist ideologies—principally from what they are exposed to and consuming online.” She praised the victims’ courage and the vigilance of teachers who reported concerns.