Farage threat trial: Jury out as accused refuses to testify

Jurors retire in the Nigel oFarage death threat trial after Afghan migrant Fayaz Khan refuses to take the stand over his alleged TikTok threat to kill the Reform leader.
An Afghan migrant accused of threatening to kill Nigel Farage in a TikTok video has declined to give evidence in his trial at Southwark Crown Court, leaving jurors to determine whether his recorded words and gestures amounted to a genuine threat.
Fayaz Khan, 26, is alleged to have posted a video between 12 and 15 October last year in which he appeared to make a gun gesture, said “pop, pop, pop,” and referenced the Reform UK leader by name.
The court heard that Khan’s post was made shortly after Mr Farage released a YouTube video titled “The Journey of an Illegal Migrant,” in which he drew attention to Khan’s own TikTok activity documenting his travels to Britain.
In that broadcast, Mr Farage questioned whether Khan — described as a “young male of fighting age” — represented the type of migrant the UK wanted to admit. The politician also drew attention to Khan’s AK-47 tattoo, visible on his face, describing it as an aggressive symbol.
Prosecutor Peter Ratliff told jurors the alleged threat was “not some off-the-cuff comment,” but rather a “sinister and menacing” video directed squarely at Mr Farage. “Mr Khan has refused to give evidence in this case,” he said.
He described the defendant as “a dangerous man with an interest in firearms,” adding that:
In the footage played to the jury, Khan addressed Mr Farage directly, saying:
The prosecutor said that as Khan spoke those words, he made distinct gun gestures with his hand, headbutted the camera and pointed to his tattoo — actions said to demonstrate that he “wasn’t joking.”
A subsequent post from Khan’s TikTok account showed an image of a GB News headline about the alleged threat, overlaid with the caption: “I mean what I say.” The jury was also shown other clips in which Khan appeared to make similar “pop, pop, pop” sounds and gestures, consistent with the tone of the disputed video.
Related Articles
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Comments are moderated before appearing.



