Homeless Somalian Mohamed lidow Assaulted Killed Mum of Three Natalie Shotter on park bench after Night Out!
Updated:Mar 12
Hi and Welcome to this Video Production News Court Verdict ReportHi and Welcome to this Video Production News Court Verdict Report
Mohamed Noor Iidow, 35, has been convicted of Manslaughter caused by Oral Rape and Sexual Assault, following the death of Natalie Shotter, an NHS worker and mother-of-three. The conviction follows a harrowing trial at the Old Bailey, where jurors wept as they were shown CCTV footage of the attack, carried out in Southall Park, west London, on July 17, 2021.
Iidow, born in Somalia, prowled the park late at night, searching for vulnerable women. He encountered Ms. Shotter, 37, who had been drinking and taking “poppers” before lying unconscious on a bench. Weighing just under seven stones, and little over 5 Foot tall, she was sadly found lifeless hours later by a passer-by.
The court heard that Iidow, described by prosecutors as a “Predator,” overstimulated the nerves in the back of Ms. Shotter’s throat, causing her to go into cardiac arrest. Ms. Shotter’s death was initially treated as unexplained before Iidow’s arrest on August 4, 2021. He was charged with manslaughter and assault on December 21, 2023.
The victim’s mother,Dr. Cas Shotter WeetmanDr. Cas Shotter Weetman, a cardiologist who has worked for the NHS for 45 years, expressed relief at the conviction. In a statement following the verdict, she described her daughter as a “beautiful soul” and said the family was “jubilant” that justice had finally been served. She noted that Ms. Shotter was not only a devoted mother but also a committed NHS worker and charity volunteer, someone who had “so much more to give.”
Dr. Weetman, however, also criticized the Metropolitan Police, alleging a culture of misogyny that she believes contributed to her daughter’s death. She highlighted an incident where officers, before Iidow’s arrest, allegedly told one of Ms. Shotter’s friends that there was nothing they could do to help.
During the trial, jurors heard that Ms. Shotter had been lying down on the bench when Iidow approached her. Prosecutor Alison Morgan narrated harrowing footage from the park, showing the moments leading up to the attack. She argued that while Ms. Shotter had consumed alcohol and poppers, this alone would not have caused her death. Instead, she asserted that Iidow’s assault directly triggered the cardiac arrest.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Comments are moderated before appearing.
Default
Share this article
The jury, composed of eight men and four women, delivered a unanimous verdict, finding Iidow guilty of both charges. Ms. Shotter’s family wept openly in court as the decision was read, marking the end of a long and painful process. Iidow, meanwhile, showed no emotion, only mouthing a few words to a supporter in the gallery.
Defense counsel Peter Glenser, KC, attempted to cast doubt on the timeline of events, suggesting there was no evidence Ms. Shotter was alive when Iidow encountered her. He argued, “There is no evidence that Ms. Shotter moved after 23.41; you cannot exclude the possibility that she was already dead.” However, the jury ultimately rejected this defense.
The court also heard that Iidow had previous convictions related to online sexual offenses, further emphasizing his predatory nature. The Common Serjeant of London, Judge Richard Marks KC, adjourned sentencing until December 14, noting the gravity of the case. He acknowledged the profound distress caused to both the jury and Ms. Shotter’s loved ones by the details presented during the trial.
Detective Chief Inspector Wayne Jolley, who led the investigation for Scotland Yard, called Iidow’s attack “disturbing and shocking.” He said, “This man drove to the park that night and took advantage of a vulnerable woman who should have been safe. Even after his arrest, Iidow claimed his actions were consensual.”
Jolley commended the strength shown by Ms. Shotter’s family throughout the trial, acknowledging the difficulty of hearing the traumatic evidence. He praised the diligence of his investigative team and the expert work involved in establishing the link between the assault and Ms. Shotter’s death.
Iidow remains in custody awaiting his sentencing, where he faces the prospect of a lengthy prison term for his crimes.
ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing.ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing.
As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:
In this case, Mohamed Noor Iidow was convicted of manslaughter and sexual assault. Under UK law, manslaughter is defined as an unlawful killing without the intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm, which distinguishes it from murder. Iidow’s conviction falls under involuntary manslaughter, as the prosecution established that his reckless and criminal behavior directly caused Natalie Shotter’s death without the intent to kill.
Manslaughter and the Legal ConsequencesManslaughter and the Legal Consequences
The relevant legislation for manslaughter in the UK is governed by common law principles. The sentence for manslaughter varies depending on the circumstances and the level of culpability. According to the Sentencing Council Guidelines for manslaughter, the sentencing range can vary from as little as 2 years to life imprisonment. Factors that are likely to be considered when determining Iidow’s sentence include:
•Aggravating factors:Aggravating factors:Iidow’s predatory behavior, the vulnerability of the victim (who was unconscious), and the fact that he has previous convictions for sexual offenses. These elements demonstrate a pattern of dangerous and predatory behavior.
•Mitigating factors:Mitigating factors:There are no apparent mitigating factors in this case, given the nature of the crime and the evidence of intent to cause harm.
ForSexual Assault,Sexual Assault,which is covered under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, Section 3, the maximum penalty is 10 years’ imprisonment. In Iidow’s case, his predatory and violent behavior during the attack, combined with his previous criminal history, increases the severity of the offense. The judge will consider these factors in deciding whether the sentences should be consecutive or concurrent, potentially leading to a substantial custodial term.
The Common Serjeant of London, Judge Richard Marks KC, will now determine the appropriate sentence for Iidow when the hearing resumes on December 14. Given the circumstances, he may receive a significant prison sentence that reflects both the gravity of the manslaughter and the sexual assault convictions.
UK law recognizes the seriousness of such offenses, especially when they involve vulnerable victims. As per Section 143 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the court must consider the harm caused and the offender’s culpability when deciding the length of the sentence. Iidow’s prior convictions and the predatory nature of the crime may lead the judge to impose an extended sentence aimed at protecting the public from future harm. The court may also consider a Sexual Harm Prevention Order to restrict his activities upon release and ensure ongoing monitoring.
By applying these laws and guidelines, the justice system aims to deliver an appropriate sentence, providing some measure of justice and protection for the public.
Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.
